Wi-Fi – “the toy that grew up”

Reprinted from the Wireless Broadband Association: Industry News Roundup

Wi-Fi – “the toy that grew up”

Historically, Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) looked at Wi-Fi as a toy, a low-end technology that was great to off-load data from networks. Now Wi-Fi is having a strategic impact on MNOs across the globe. Now the question is LTE or Wi-Fi: remind me which one’s for off-load?

Yet, as with many technical innovations, the low-end always wins. Wi-Fi is a classic example of this theory. Through a combination of Moore’s Law, economies of scale, R&D investments and free market dynamics Wi-Fi is king of the hill. In most developed countries people and things can access a Wi-Fi network in 80% of locations. Companies, such as Devicescape, have created virtual networks based on “ambient’ Wi-Fi networks. Hotspots are so ubiquitous that Opensignal launched an application to find the best one out of the many available.

Wi-Fi and Hotspots are becoming strategic to all carriers (fixed and mobile) as they have realized the importance of keeping traffic on their network for quality of experience and billing purposes. The market for carrier Wi-Fi gear continues to grow as carriers look to exploit these opportunities.

Today, high- speed access to the Internet is as fundamental as indoor plumbing. People expect it and city and national governments view it as mandatory for many economic development and quality of life issues. With the ubiquity of Wi-Fi enabled devices and the simplicity of Wi-Fi deployments it is no surprise that Wi-Fi is a leading candidate to achieve this. Even in remote,rural and under-developed regions, Wi-Fi leads the ways.

Even with fierce competition from ZigBee and other alternatives Wi-Fi is also a leading network technology for applications using IoT technologies. Wearables are no exception. LG smart watches use Wi-Fi and researchers are looking to Wi-Fi for an entire body network. We could all become Wi-Fi access points.

Yet success breeds challenges. Wi-Fi uses attractive unlicensed frequency bands and the licensed crowd wants in as the LTE community is looking to use the same 5 Ghz frequency band. Trying to head off a battle royale, the U.S. FCC has already entered the fray.

Wi-Fi, the toy that grew up, continues its momentum to solve real problems for consumers, businesses, service providers and governments. It was often said never to bet against Ethernet, I’d like to add never bet against Wi-Fi.

Greg Whelan, ACG Research

To discuss this and other strategic technology issues impacting the global service provider market please contact me

Virtualization: There’s got to be more!

Virtualization: There’s got to be more!  

Porting to Intel and Virtual Machines is a technical implementation detail not a business solution.  

When vendors are asked about their virtualization strategy you often hear a common answer.  They say they’re “virtual” since they ported their software to Intel.   What’s the value proposition?  Porting to Intel isn’t it. Sure it reduces CAPEX, at the expense of performance.   All it really does is shift industry revenue, power and influence from the Broadcoms of the world to Intel.  Plus, we now know that if CAPEX goes to ZERO less than 33% of CxO’s top of mind business problems are solved.  When pressed for the rest of their virtualization strategy they say the run on virtual machines in a data center.  OK, and then what? 

Let’s assume they perform three functions called A, B and C.  They port them to Intel and then run them on virtual machines (VMs).    Shifting revenue from Broadcom to Intel is a technical implementation detail and not a business solution.  Service providers should be thinking there’s got to be more. 

The logical question to ask is whether A, B and C are the right functions in the virtual world.  Just because they were required in yesterday’s environment does not mean they are required in the virtual world.   Do you really need 20% of A and 60% of B?  Do you really need 150% of C?  You get the picture.

Service providers will be spending billions of dollars moving to the virtual world they should be asking themselves, why?   Sure there’s a benefit to take the A’s, B’s and C’s of today’s world to virtual machines.  But is it really enough?  This is a one in a lifetime transformation and a fight for ultimate survival.  SP’s need to ask for more. 

Vendors on the other hand need to be asking themselves similar questions.  Is porting to Intel enough?  What can we do that’s game changing in the virtual world?  The answer, IMHO, to the first question is No Way.  The answer to the second question depends on the vendor’s core competencies, ecosystem presence, business strategy et al.    The good news is that ACG Research can help you answer this second question.  Give us a shout.